Empathy in Exile: Part 1 - The Emotional Heresy of Compassion
From the Emotional Heresy Series
Return to the Emotional Heresy Series Hub
How Christian Nationalism Cast Out Empathy to Protect Power
A word to the reader:
If you were ever told your empathy made you weak…
If you were ever punished for crying, for caring too much, for “taking things too personally”…
If you were ever made to feel that your emotions were disobedience, and your tenderness was sin—
Then this isn’t just an essay.
It’s a homecoming.
When I Realized I Was Grieving for People Who Hurt Me
It came quietly—like most sacred things do.
Not as a flash of insight, but as a slow ache. A pressure behind the ribs. A recognition that I had been self-soothing for years, not only for my own pain, but for the pain others refused to feel.
I wasn’t just hurt by them.
I was hurting for them.
For the brother who scoffs at emotions and claims logic as his gospel—but makes choices rooted in unspoken fear.
For the people who dehumanize the poor, the addict, the unhoused—because they can’t bear to see a reflection of the parts they were told to reject in themselves.
For the voices who shout “truth over feelings,” not realizing they’re silencing the very humanity they’re desperate to reclaim.
I was grieving the loss of their tenderness—
The exile of their empathy—
The holy ache they’d been taught to cast out.
And suddenly, I saw it:
Their cruelty wasn’t always rooted in malice.
Sometimes it was a coping mechanism with a pulpit.
A theology of suppression.
A system of emotional survival that confuses numbness with faithfulness.
Jesus Wept—and They Called It Weakness
We were told Jesus died for us.
But no one said he cried for us, too.
“Jesus wept.” (John 11:35)
The shortest verse in the Bible—because sometimes the most important truths don’t need to be long. They just need to be felt.
He didn’t rush to fix.
He didn’t rebuke the mourners.
He stood in their sorrow and let it become his own.
But in the churches I grew up around, I rarely heard that verse.
We weren’t taught to weep.
We were taught to obey. To suppress. To worship a savior who wept—while being told that weeping made us weak.
What if Empathy Was the Original Heresy?
Christian nationalism doesn’t exile empathy by accident. It exiles empathy because empathy breaks the hierarchy.
You can’t love your neighbor while defending policies that harm them.
You can’t dehumanize someone when you’re listening to their story.
You can’t worship a man who touched lepers and lifted women—and call empathy “liberal nonsense.”
And so, over time, compassion was reframed as rebellion.
Empathy became heresy.
And emotion? Emotion became evidence that you hadn’t died to yourself enough.
But what if…
Emotion isn’t the problem?
What if compassion wasn’t the corruption—but the cure?
The Shift Toward Control: When Compassion Became a Threat
It didn’t start with megachurches or politicians waving Bibles in one hand and fear in the other.
It started centuries ago—when Christianity traded its sandals for a sword.
When Constantine merged church and empire, faith became a tool of control.
Emotion? Too unpredictable.
Compassion? Too destabilizing.
Mercy? Too expensive.
Empathy had no place in an empire that needed citizens to obey, not feel.
And the theology evolved to match the politics:
Augustine painted desire and emotion as the residue of sin.
Calvin warned that the human heart was “a perpetual factory of idols.”
Puritans built entire communities on emotional austerity—feel too much, and you must be under demonic influence.
Obedience became salvation.
Certainty became holiness.
And emotion became a liability.
“Blessed are the meek” became “blessed are the rule followers.”
“Love your neighbor” became “discipline your neighbor.”
We learned to fear our feelings.
We called it wisdom.
We called it theology.
But it was emotional abandonment in the name of spiritual maturity.
Christian Nationalism and the Rebranding of Empathy
Today, the echoes are deafening.
Empathy is called “soft.”
Compassion is dismissed as “bleeding heart.”
Helping the poor is “socialism.”
Supporting the mentally ill is “enabling.”
Caring about immigrants is “lawlessness.”
Feeling deeply is “emotional instability.”
And mercy—real mercy—is seen as weakness.
But make no mistake: this isn’t a new idea.
It’s the same old fear, wrapped in a flag and baptized in cultural anxiety.
Christian nationalism doesn’t need Jesus.
It needs a weaponized image of Jesus—one who punishes, excludes, and demands compliance.
Because real empathy—real, grounded, embodied empathy—disrupts the entire system.
You cannot worship a savior who washed feet and wept over cities—
and still justify cages for children, neglect of the sick, or mockery of the unhoused.
Empathy threatens empire.
So it’s cast out.
What We Lost When Empathy Was Exiled
When we severed emotion from faith, we didn’t become more holy.
We became more hollow.
We lost our ability to:
Sit with suffering instead of rushing to correct it
Comfort without trying to convert
Love without keeping score
Witness pain without theological explanations
We began to fear feeling—especially in others.
Because if we let ourselves feel their pain…
We might have to question our systems.
We might have to lay down our power.
We might have to change.
And nothing terrifies a brittle theology more than change.
What’s the cost of empathy’s exile?
A generation that thinks their feelings are a flaw.
A church that confuses control for care.
A culture that punishes softness while silently grieving its absence.
The Return of Compassion: A Sacred Rebellion
But what if exile isn’t the end of the story?
What if the act of feeling—of truly allowing empathy back into the body—isn’t heresy…
but healing?
What if reclaiming our emotions is a homecoming?
When Jesus wept, no one asked if it was strategic.
He didn’t calculate whether it was rational.
He simply allowed grief to move through him—and in that moment, God became human in the most intimate way possible.
You were not wrong to feel.
You were not weak to care.
You were just living in a system that had exiled the very thing that could save it.
A Question for Reflection
When were you first taught that your empathy was too much?
Who benefited from your silence, your shame, or your emotional withdrawal?
What part of your faith—or your self—are you ready to welcome home?
NEXT - Part 2 – How They Trained Us Not to Feel
The Programming That Taught Us to Abandon Our Hearts
Read the post →
