Overview:
This episode explores how calls for justice are often reframed as attacks on unity by those in power. We unpack the manipulative strategy of labeling truth-telling as “divisive,” while ignoring the violence, exclusion, or inequality that made the truth necessary to begin with.
When the system confuses silence with peace and control with order, those who demand justice are painted as the problem — not the prophets.
In This Episode:
Why truth is often perceived as disruptive in systems of control
How “division” is weaponized to shut down accountability
The emotional and social cost of speaking up for justice
The difference between artificial unity and authentic peace
Why real healing begins with conflict, not denial
Key Concepts Covered:
Respectability politics and the myth of “civil” discourse
How religious and political leaders use “unity” as a shield
The psychological toll of being labeled divisive for telling the truth
The courage it takes to disrupt false harmony
Featured Frameworks:
12 Utilities: Justice-seeking restores fairness, voice, safety, and recognition
PERMAH: Flourishing requires meaning and authentic connection, not performative unity
Prospect Theory: Those in power fear perceived loss more than they value others’ gain
Admiration Equation: Those who disrupt for justice evoke awe, gratitude, and lasting respect — even if they’re vilified at first
Memorable Quote:
“If truth divides us, it’s not because truth is harmful — it’s because denial was holding us together.”
Reflection Prompt:
Have you ever been called divisive for telling the truth?
What would unity rooted in justice—not silence—look like?
Share this post